The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has been tracking views of the health law since 2009. Its poll in January indicated for the first time that more people viewed the health law as a good idea than as a bad one.
Voters are conflicted over outgoing President Barack Obama’s place in history, but they agree the passage of Obamacare will be the defining marker of his presidency.A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 32% of Likely U.S. Voters believe Obama will be remembered most for the national health care law. His handling of social and racial issues, the Iran nuclear deal and his policies on illegal immigration and refugees are all tied for a distant second with nine percent (9%) support each.
The American Action Forum (@AAF) today released a national survey of likely voters on health care. The poll was conducted by OnMessage Inc from July 5-7th. Overall the survey found that a majority believe private insurance companies are better at providing quality health care coverage than the federal government, 57 to 26 percent. When asked about affordability of health care, 48 percent say private insurance companies are better at providing affordable coverage.
The national survey also found that 61 percent oppose a single payer health care system, and 51 percent oppose the Affordable Care Act. These are significant as majorities believe that it has been unfair for the administration to change the rules of Obamacare for private health insurers and that harming private insurance may lead to a single payer system.
That even a slim majority of Republicans favor expansion is notable given the tone of debate on this issue on the campaign trail, where expansion has become like a third rail for GOP candidates. This is not to suggest that Republican candidates or governors who oppose Medicaid expansion in conservative states will be anxious to flip any time soon. But Medicaid may not be as unpopular with Republicans overall as the conventional wisdom suggests, and other issues may be more salient for Republican voters in primary and general elections across the country than opposition to Medicaid expansion.
The erosion of the belief in health care as a government-protected right is perhaps the most dramatic reflection of these trends. In 2006, by a margin of more than two to one, 69-28, those surveyed by Gallup said that the federal government should guarantee health care coverage for all citizens of the United States. By late 2014, however, Gallup found that this percentage had fallen 24 points to 45 percent, while the percentage of respondents who said health care is not a federal responsibility nearly doubled to 52 percent.
A new poll by McLaughlin & Associates finds that Americans strongly support having Congress advance a conservative alternative in the context of King v. Burwell.
The poll asked (question #7),
“If the Supreme Court rules that the Obama administration has been illegally paying out Obamacare subsidies in 36 states, what do you think Congress should do in response?”
Likely voters replied as follows:
“Do nothing and let people in those 36 states lose their subsidies and perhaps their insurance”: 4 percent
“Negotiate fixes to Obamacare with the Obama White House in exchange for turning the subsidies back on”: 20 percent
“Turn the subsidies back on temporarily but don’t try to fix Obamacare”: 5 percent
“Propose to effectively repeal and replace Obamacare in those 36 states with a conservative alternative that aims to help people get coverage and reduce costs”: 26 percent
“Give the states a choice between Obamacare and switching to a conservative alternative that aims to help people get coverage and reduce costs”: 25 percent
“Something else”: 8 percent
“No opinion”: 13 percent
Support for having Congress propose a conservative alternative (either for the 36 states in question or for all states that choose to switch to such an alternative) was 64 percent among Republicans and 55 percent among independents, while the most popular answer among Democrats (34 percent, compared with only 10 percent among Republicans and 12 percent among independents) was that Congress should negotiate fixes to Obamacare.
As for the voters who believed all the misrepresentations, they were more credulous than stupid. Though it was obvious to millions of us that the ironically named Affordable Care Act was never going to increase access to care while also improving quality and decreasing cost, Obama’s supporters thought he was a “post-partisan” politician who could be trusted. They failed to subject his implausible claims to serious scrutiny and therefore missed what was wrong with the rosy picture he was painting. It is these voters who should be most insulted by Gruber’s remarks. It is their naïveté that the President and his co-conspirators cynically exploited.