November 8, 2011
Our old friend and Healthy Blog founder, John McDonough, today opened up his new blog at Boston.com. He’s calling it Health Stew, and explains “I like stew because lots of different ingredients get thrown in, often with delicious results. I’m interested in lots of things related to health care policy and politics, and how odd things can fit together.”
Already there’s an introductory post, and a discussion about whether Massachusetts really does have the highest health care costs in the nation.
You’ll want to bookmark this: http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/health_stew.
via Bookmark Me: New John McDonough Health Blog |.
October 15, 2011
From The Local: Sweden’s News in English:
“While Sweden has long taken pride in its public healthcare system, lengthening queues and at times inconsistent care have prompted many Swedes to opt for private healthcare with many gaining the benefit through insurance policies offered by employers, currently responsible for 80% of healthcare insurance market.
The idea behind private health insurance is simple enough: those put off by the idea of heading to publicly funded clinics and hospitals can purchase a policy through an insurance company and instead enjoy speedy medical attention with private doctors.
As many as 500,000 Swedes are now estimated to be using private healthcare insurance, up from 100,000 only ten years ago. And a flawed public system is often cited as the cause of the rapid expansion.
Long queues are one of the main complaints for consumers of Sweden’s public healthcare services, with patients sometimes forced to wait as much as fifteen times longer for treatment compared to private options.”
via CARPE DIEM.
October 12, 2011
Perhaps most important, a design approach would ensure that we keep our focus on patients, rather than on dubious animal models that are often far more effective at generating research grants and advancing academic careers than they are at providing meaningful insight into a disease afflicting patients. It might also stimulate some of our smartest and most creative basic medical scientists–researchers who have traditionally been drawn to reductive, highly simplified systems–to start innovating around patients, trying to develop a far more detailed and relevant understanding of disease as it exists in the organism that ultimately holds our greatest interest and investment: ourselves.
Revolutionizing fundamental medical research may be an unreasonably audacious goal, but figuring it out–finding a way to incorporate in a meaningful fashion the principles of design thinking in the approach and strategy of basic scientists–is a worthy ambition, and one I suspect Steve Jobs would have felt proud to inspire. Let the conversation begin.
via Articles & Commentary.
August 29, 2011
This week, two economists argue that data from a natural experiment in Oregon provides insight into this question 1. Oregon Medicaid had a waiting list of 90,000 people who wanted access to health insurance coverage. One third of these people were randomly selected to be given coverage and we now know the one year results of this experiment: a 25% increase in total annual health care expenditures including an increased probability of using outpatient care by 35%, of using prescription drugs by 15%, and of hospital admission by 30%. This was accompanied by an increase in use of preventive services (mammogram use increased by 60%). Overall, people with insurance were more likely to report that they are in good or better health status, and less likely to report that they are depressed.
via Health Sector Management Director’s Corner.
August 24, 2011
The White House, continuing its rhetorical approach employed during recent budget negotiations, has publicly expressed the hope that this committee will “seek a balanced approach to larger deficit reduction.”Different observers will inevitably have different opinions of what constitutes “balance.” I offer the view that no deficit-reduction agreement can credibly be called balanced if it fails to do one simple and necessary thing: cut the projected cost of new spending enacted in last year’s health care law.
via Job One for the Budget Super-Committee: Cut the New Health Entitlement’s Cost | e21 – Economic Policies for the 21st Century.
August 22, 2011
The Eleventh Circuit majority opinion (nicely summarized by Dan Miller) is noteworthy not only as the most thorough judicial discussion to date — 207 pages — but as an opinion written jointly by Chief Judge Joel F. Dubina (appointed by the first President Bush) and Judge Frank M. Hull (appointed by President Clinton). As a single opinion, co-authored by two experienced judges, appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents, it has considerable persuasive force.
The federal district courts have divided on the constitutionality of ObamaCare under the Commerce Clause; the courts of appeal have now split 1-1 (we are awaiting the decision of the Fourth Circuit); and the Supreme Court will have to provide the definitive answer. But with respect to one argument — the attempt to uphold the ObamaCare mandate as a “tax” under the Tax and Spending Clause of the Constitution — the verdict is pretty clear: the Eleventh Circuit became the seventh straight court in which the government failed to convince a single judge.
via Pajamas Media » ObamaCare and the Constitutional Road Not Taken.
August 19, 2011
Elements of ObamaCare spending are now in the mix to be cut. I like this; liberals will hate it.
This injects ObamaCare spending squarely into the Joint Committee negotiations, and not just the vulnerable parts. I hope Republicans appointed to the Joint Committee will argue for repeal of these big new entitlements. I think Congressional Republicans erred by leaving it out of the last battle.
It also brings ObamaCare back into the broader fiscal policy and election debate.
via If the Joint Committee fails, some ObamaCare spending will be cut | Keith Hennessey.