With Eyes on His Vote in Health Subsidies Case, Roberts Lets on Little – NYTimes.com

How unusual was Chief Justice Roberts’s vote in the 2012 health care case? Very. It remains the only 5-to-4 decision in which he joined the four liberal members of the court, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan….

As a backup argument, Mr. Verrilli had said the justices should defer to the interpretation of the Internal Revenue Service, which says subsidies are available nationwide, if they found the health care law itself to be ambiguous.

“If you’re right,” Chief Justice Roberts asked Mr. Verrilli, “that would indicate that a subsequent administration could change that interpretation?”

Mr. Verrilli, resisting a victory that might vanish in 2016, urged the court to rule on the basis of the statute itself.

That comment from Chief Justice Roberts was the closest he came to probing the core of the case before him. It did almost nothing to tip his hand.

The best evidence of his views may well still be found in part of his 2012 health care opinion, one joined by no other justice.

“It is not our job,” he wrote, “to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”

via With Eyes on His Vote in Health Subsidies Case, Roberts Lets on Little – NYTimes.com.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s