The Basic Income Guarantee: Simplicity, but at What Cost? | Cato Unbound

In theory, a universal basic income offers an intriguing alternative to our current dysfunctional welfare state.  But a closer look raises several questions about whether and how a UBI could be implemented in a way that doesn’t create more problems than it solves.

I set aside the question of whether redistribution – for that is what UBI really is – is ever justified.  Matt Zwolinski makes a solid case in favor of such efforts, and certainly a limited amount of redistribution has been supported in the past by prominent libertarians, including Hayek, Nozick, and Friedman among others. On the other hand, as Michael Huemer points out, UBI will, of necessity, violate the Nonaggression Principle at the heart of much of modern libertarianism.  Yet, as interesting as such debates are, there will be some form of government-imposed redistribution for the foreseeable future. The real question therefore is whether UBI offers a better way to fight poverty.

via The Basic Income Guarantee: Simplicity, but at What Cost? | Cato Unbound.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s