Few Americans who read a newspaper didn’t hear about last year’s Veterans Health Administration scandal, in which VA officials manipulated patient waiting lists in order to deny care to ailing veterans. I observed at the time that the VA’s brand of government-run medicine was far worse than Obamacare. And I questioned why lawmakers hadn’t done more to reform veterans’ health care. Today, Concerned Veterans for America is publishing the most comprehensive effort in decades to reform the VA, and to ensure that veterans gain access to the same high-quality health care available to most Americans.
Or, as the prosecuting attorney might say in the closing argument for a criminal trial, the Congress that enacted what became the ACA — before it lost a temporary “supermajority” in the Senate favoring its passage — had “the means, and the opportunity” to authorize tax credits in federal exchanges in December 2009, if it wanted to. By March 2010, it had a different “motive” to continue not to do so, when it needed to pass a law by any means necessary that became the final text of the ACA.
Gallup misreads its state ACA data: state-run marketplaces no better at reaching uninsured | xpostfactoidFebruary 25, 2015
Gallup does a great service in tracking the decline in the uninsured rate state-by-state since ACA implementation. But they draw a misleading conclusion from their latest data set:
Collectively, the uninsured rate in states that have chosen to expand Medicaid and set up their own state exchanges or partnerships in the health insurance marketplace declined significantly more last year than the rate in states that did not take these steps. The uninsured rate declined 4.8 points in the 21 states that implemented both of these measures, compared with a 2.7-point drop across the 29 states that have implemented only one or neither of these actions.
In fact, the superior overall performance of these states in reducing un-insurance is due entirely to the Medicaid expansion. Collectively, their exchanges did not perform particularly well with regard to enrolling subsidy-eligible residents in private health plans.
Obamacare’s Medicaid Expansion Could Cause 2.6 Million Able-Bodied Adults To Drop Out Of Labor ForceFebruary 25, 2015
One of the biggest myths pushed in statehouses across the country is that Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion will be an engine of economic growth. The Obama administration promises that more than 350,000 jobs would be created nationwide in 2015 if all states opted into Obamacare expansion.
But the truth is that expanding Medicaid to able-bodied adults will discourage work, create massive new welfare cliffs and ultimately shrink the economy, not grow it. A new report by the Foundation for Government Accountability outlines how Obamacare expansion could affect the labor force.
HealthCare.gov CEO: President Obama Will No Longer Be In Office When HC.gov’s Back End Is Expected to be Fully Complete | Energy & Commerce CommitteeFebruary 24, 2015
An important disclaimer: All those press releases about how the health care law is working – ignore them. We now have two open enrollment periods on the books (mostly) and the backend of HealthCare.gov is still not complete. Now, the HealthCare.gov CEO is disclosing the backend will not be complete before President Obama leaves the White House. Politico Pro reports this morning, “HealthCare.gov CEO Kevin Counihan told insurance brokers today that CMS is spending a lot of time focusing on how to improve the federal exchanges’ back-end functions and that the agency meets at least weekly with a group of insurance officials from large companies to discuss its two-year development plan.” Counihan added, “It’s not going to be as fast as everybody wants, but we’re going to get there. We’re going to make good progress this year and even more progress next year.”
The committee first uncovered that the backend of the health care exchange was not built in November 2013. The following month, then-Health and Human Services Secretary told the committee, “The financial management system, which is getting the insurance companies their money for accelerated tax credits and cost-sharing, is due to go into effect in mid-January.” That was “mid-January” of last year. Now, two open enrollment periods and more than 16 months after the exchanges first went live, the HealthCare.gov CEO reveals the backend will still not be complete for two more years.
via HealthCare.gov CEO: President Obama Will No Longer Be In Office When HC.gov’s Back End Is Expected to be Fully Complete | Energy & Commerce Committee.
Implementing Health Reform: Beginning The Cadillac Tax Regulatory Conversation And Other ACA News – Health Affairs BlogFebruary 24, 2015
An amendment to the 2015 federal budget continuing appropriation raises a question: Will insurers receive their full 2014 risk corridor payments?
What’s the issue?
The risk corridor program created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has proven to be one of the most controversial aspects of the health care law. Questions have been raised about the source of payments, whether the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has the authority to make payments under the program, and whether the program is required to be budget neutral.
In response to questions from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on its budget authority for risk corridor payments, HHS cited section 1342 of the ACA, which establishes the risk corridor program and requires HHS to collect payments from and make payments to certain qualified health plans. HHS says that the fees collected and the payments made under the risk corridor program are consistent with the definition of user fees.
The fiscal year 2014 appropriation gives the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) the authority to collect user fees and keep the fees available for use through the 2019 fiscal year. HHS states that this appropriation along with section 1342 gives CMS the authority to collect and distribute risk corridor payments. In an opinion issued September 2014, the GAO agreed that payments collected under the risk corridor program are “properly characterized as user fees.”
via Health Policy Briefs.